‘Harry Potter’ Star Blasts J.Okay. Rowling For Celebrating Anti-Trans Court docket Ruling

The continued controversy surrounding J.Okay. Rowling‘s views on gender id has taken one other dramatic flip, as “Harry Potter” star Sean Biggerstaff has publicly referred to as out the writer.

The outburst got here in response to Rowling celebrating a latest U.Okay. Supreme Court docket ruling that transgender ladies aren’t legally ladies.

Along with Sean Biggerstaff, different stars from “Harry Potter,” together with lead actors Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, have disagreed with J.Okay. Rowling’s views about trans ladies.

J.Okay. Rowling has as soon as once more come beneath fireplace from a “Harry Potter” alum for her detrimental views about trans ladies.

This time, she was criticized by Sean Biggerstaff, who starred within the fantasy film franchise as Oliver Wooden.

It started with Rowling sharing a controversial publish of her celebrating a latest U.Okay. Supreme Court docket ruling towards trans ladies being legally ladies.

Within the publish, Rowling might be seen elevating a glass crammed with what appeared to be alcohol whereas smoking a cigar aboard her $150 million superyacht.

The publish led to her going through accusations of “smoking a blunt,” to which the billionaire writer clapped again on social media by firmly clarifying that it was “objectively, provably, and demonstrably a cigar.”

Biggerstaff then responded to her publish, saying, “Bigotry rots the wit.”

Doubling down on his criticism, the Harry Potter star additionally retweeted a publish from a social media person who in contrast the acclaimed writer to Andrew Tate, a crimson tablet influencer identified for puffing on cigars in lots of his movies.

“lol, huffing on a cigar now? Is she Andrew Tate?” the tweet learn, per the Every day Mail.

In a unique publish, Biggerstaff slammed Rowling as an “obsessed billionaire,” displaying his distaste in regards to the writer allegedly funding the marketing campaign group that introduced the case towards trans ladies.

Rowling had first shared an image of the main ladies on the case, Susan Smith and Marion Calder, including the comment “in case it wasn’t clear: do not f-ck with Scottish ladies.”

Biggerstaff then quoted the publish with, “Nearly all of Scottish ladies, who do not agree with these d-ckheads, aren’t being bankrolled by an obsessed billionaire.”

Other than his criticism of Rowling, Biggerstaff additionally expressed assist for trans ladies in mild of the controversial Supreme Court docket ruling.

He wrote that the “loudest voices” have been “utilizing concern for sex-based rights as cowl for totally reactionary politics” and referred to as their behaviour “a efficiency of pragmatism to cloak their instinctive distaste for the Different.”

Up to now, the “Harry Potter” trio, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, have additionally disagreed with Rowling’s views in regards to the transgender group.

This has led to them having a strained relationship with Rowling, which culminated together with her overtly declaring that she couldn’t “forgive” the trio or different celebrities who assist trans individuals.

“Celebs who cosied as much as a motion intent on eroding ladies’s hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and susceptible ladies reliant on single intercourse areas,” Rowling wrote on X on the time, per the Every day Mail.

“Youngsters have been irreversibly harmed, and hundreds are complicit, not simply medics, however the celeb mouthpieces, unquestioning media, and cynical companies,” she added later.

Rowling went on to deal with the motion as a scandal whose “penalties” might be felt for many years and additional doubled down on her criticism of its supporters.

She mentioned, “You probably did all you might to impede and misrepresent analysis. You tried to bully individuals out of their jobs for opposing you. Younger individuals have been experimented on, left infertile and in ache.”

In a latest publish on X, Rowling appeared to take purpose at Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint over their vocal opposition to her remarks about trans individuals.

It started with a publish that requested, “What actor/actress immediately ruins a film for you?”

Rowling then responded with a cryptic comment, quoting the publish and writing, “Three guesses… sorry, that was irresistible.”

She additionally added three laughing emojis to her remark, which has since garnered over 69k likes and 22 million views on the social media platform.