What Stood Out In My Evaluation

Some years again, I witnessed a magnanimous safety breach of a trademarked firm web site in my earlier firm, which left the IT crew frozen in shock.

Had the menace been detected or analyzed earlier, a correct menace detection and mitigation framework may need prevented the mishap.

It additionally intrigued me to have some talks over tea with my firm’s community engineers and cybersecurity analysts to get intel on the options or advantages they search from a menace intelligence device immediately.

With their insights, I observed the demand for multi-source knowledge aggregation to create and correlate threats, real-time menace detection and monitoring, automation, AI-driven knowledge privateness, and contextual menace intelligence, that are key options in menace intelligence instruments that may forestall disastrous outcomes.

With this define, I sought to investigate and consider 7 greatest menace intelligence instruments out there immediately to create and co-relate threats, analyze and mitigate safety dangers and scale back the dependency on guide groups to extract menace histories and causes. Let’s get into it!

7 greatest menace intelligence instruments: my high picks

A menace intelligence device protects and safeguards a company in opposition to numerous safety dangers, corresponding to cyber assaults, brute power assaults, zero-day assaults, and zero-day vulnerabilities. Once I began evaluating menace intelligence instruments, my main focus was on which instruments are fitted with the most recent safety protocols to keep up robust encryption requirements for a company’s knowledge and supply real-time menace detection.

Whereas evaluating and researching, I famous key parameters {that a} safety crew searches for, corresponding to the necessity to acquire and correlate menace knowledge from numerous sources, together with open supply intelligence (OSINT), business feeds, and inside logs. Consumers additionally search instruments that supply AI-based automation for menace evaluation and contextual menace intelligence to detect ways, methods, and procedures concerning threats.

My evaluation covers the highest 7 menace intelligence instruments out there, which provide strong safety frameworks to fight any threat of unwarranted threats.

What makes a menace intelligence device value it: my opinion 

My evaluation had a singleton conclusion; a device that identifies clever patterns of AI-powered cyberattacks or knowledge breaches and alerts the system about potential threats or safety warnings is a perfect menace intelligence device.

Additional, these methods combine with SIEM instruments, antivirus instruments and endpoint detection instruments to strengthen the safety posture and determine and mitigate threats sooner.

With a powerful deal with safety and privateness, I recognized the next essential options that it is best to look out for in a menace intelligence device. 

• Automated menace knowledge aggregation and normalization: Once I assess any menace intelligence device, the very first thing I guarantee is that it may well create and correlate menace knowledge from a number of sources like OSINT, inside logs, and business feeds. This was a vital step in contextualizing menace and standardizing menace patterns for sooner evaluation and real-time detection. With out aggregation and normalization, menace knowledge stays chaotic and virtually unusable. A very good device unifies this info and saves numerous guide hours of labor for analysts.
• Contextualized menace enrichment: I additionally thought-about which instruments contextualized threats along with sending an alert or warning within the system. A powerful menace enrichment module is essential to forecasting and mitigating the menace. The platform should layer crucial metadata, corresponding to attacker ways (MITRE ATT&CK), industries focused, and malware households used, so that you just aren’t simply seeing what the menace is but in addition why it issues to them particularly. Instruments that fail to do that go away customers flying blind.
• Actual-time menace detection and alerting: Clever snoopers or attackers create new infiltration patterns each second. Which is why a menace intelligence device ought to be powered with real-time detection and actionable alerting. Whether or not through integrations with SIEMs, SOARs, or standalone dashboards, these instruments ought to combat AI-powered attacking mechanisms with tight protection mitigation methods. With real-time menace detection, you possibly can transfer and react at machine velocity and never with a “next-business-day” nature. 
• Tailor-made intelligence in your trade and threat profile: In my analysis, these instruments are deemed greatest as a result of they permit you to customise menace feeds and intelligence based mostly in your trade, geography, digital footprint, and particular threat urge for food. Customization ensures that the crew will get related, actionable insights and never a truckload of irrelevant alerts with no measurement of threat depth.
• Menace investigation and deep dive analytics module: These instruments wanted to be geared up with a complicated analytics dashboard to show menace circumstances, menace sources, and menace mitigation knowledge. They even have investigation workbenches the place you possibly can pivot between menace indicators, discover assault paths, enrich IPs and domains, and join dots throughout campaigns. Investigative agility makes the distinction between reactive defence and proactive looking. 
• Collaboration, sharing and reporting capabilities: In a contemporary safety ecosystem, no crew operates alone. That is why I shortlisted instruments which have built-in mechanisms for sharing intelligence with inside or exterior groups, organizations and even ISACs and nationwide cyber alliances to kind a sturdy infrastructure of safety. Equally necessary is automated and customizable reporting in order that safety groups can simply talk threat and influence to management and non-technical stakeholders.

All of it boils all the way down to how a menace intelligence device creates menace knowledge, contextualizes threats with forecasting, and catches maintain of sensible AI-based breaches to set off menace alerts and protection methods to counter dangers.

Instruments that stood out by way of buyer satisfaction, buyer section, and G2 sentiment scoring are the highest menace intelligence device contenders on this checklist since they’re based mostly on real-time G2 consumer evaluation knowledge.

Out of a number of menace intelligence instruments that I evaluated, the highest 7 have made it to this checklist. This checklist beneath accommodates real evaluations from the menace intelligence class web page. To be included on this class, a software program should:

• Present info on rising threats and vulnerabilities.
• Element remediation practices for widespread and rising threats.
• Analyze international threats on various kinds of networks and units 
• Cater menace info to particular IT options.

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some evaluations might have been edited for readability.  

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a cloud native endpoint detection and software safety platform that retains your safety methods updated and defends your on-prem or cloud knowledge in opposition to unwarranted assaults or breaches.

What instantly impressed me was how simple it was to combine with my present Azure setup. The preliminary deployment was principally easy; no further configuration is required until you are going deep into hybrid or multi-cloud environments.

It simply clicked with Azure companies, Microsoft 365, and even AWS and GCP, which was a nice shock. In addition they have a pay-as-you-go subscription mannequin that feels versatile in case you are not prepared for an enormous dedication upfront.

One of many first issues that stood out was the safety rating dashboard. It is like a real-time report card in your cloud posture that highlights vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and dangerous assets. I cherished how detailed it was, breaking down particular person assets inside every subscription and giving clear suggestions for fixing points. 

Generally, in case you are fortunate, you possibly can even simply click on “Repair” and it auto remediates. That saved me a bunch of time. Plus, the combination with Azure Lively Listing made id safety tremendous easy.

The distinction between tiers in premium options was fairly noticeable. The free tier provides you fundamentals like safety assessments, suggestions, and coverage administration. Actually, that is sufficient to get you began.

However as soon as I upgraded to the usual plan, issues acquired a bit extra highly effective. I acquired entry to just-in-time VM entry, adaptive software controls, and community menace detection. The Simply in time entry characteristic is a lifesaver in case you are working with VMs and wish to cut back publicity with out manually shutting issues on and off on a regular basis.

Additionally, there’s one other characteristic generally known as Defender for Servers, a premium plan that shocked me with options like file integrity monitoring (it alerts on file modifications however generally misses the context of potential malicious exercise). It will be even higher if they may proactively flag behaviours as a substitute of simply logging modifications.

I additionally need to point out their help for menace safety, real-time detection, AI-based menace analytics, anti-malware, and anti-phishing. It is particularly nice at monitoring e mail threats, with whitelisting choices that allow you to shield trusted distributors.

Plus, the multi-cloud safety protection is not simply Azure-exclusive; it expands throughout AWS and GCP, providing insights and proposals tailor-made to every cloud.

There are some areas to enhance, nonetheless. Some customers actually struggled with the difficulty of complexity. Organising among the extra superior options, like multi-cloud monitoring or integrations with third-party options like Mimecast, wasn’t precisely plug-and-play, particularly in the event you aren’t acquainted with how Microsoft buildings its insurance policies and configurations.

Some customers even discovered third-party connections clunkier. And a few had been irritated with the speed of false positives.

Defender generally flagged completely benign actions as suspicious, inflicting pointless alerts that my crew needed to waste time investigating. 

Pricing was one other problem. For small companies, particularly, the transfer to extra superior plans might really feel steep, and the truth that sure anticipated options (like deeper e mail safety or Workplace integrations) are generally locked behind increased tiers felt a bit irritating. 

So far as efficiency is anxious, it was principally stable, however in environments with unstable web connections, the dependency on cloud generally led to slight lag.  And the help expertise appeared closely tiered. Until you might have a paid subscription with Microsoft Assist, you aren’t all the time assured top-tier assist.

Additionally, if I’m being sincere, the consumer interface was a bit incomprehensible. Microsoft tends to roll out new options and UI modifications fairly quickly, so proper whenever you get used to a structure, it is probably that they may throw a curveball your approach. 

General, Microsoft Defender for Cloud protects your on-premises and cloud knowledge in opposition to the chance of safety breaches and helps you monitor safety postures throughout totally different databases from a centralized platform.

What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

• Though the device supplies endpoint safety for all units, the deployment course of may be very complicated when configuring safety for iOS system. 
• One other gripe I discovered was the pricing. It could possibly rapidly turn into costly, and the overload of alerts results in false positives. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

“What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the complicated pricing, which might rapidly turn into costly, and the overload of alerts, usually resulting in false positives. Moreover, the mukti-cloud help is not as strong for non-azure platforms, the preliminary setups may be sophisticated for groups with out cloud safety setup expertise.”

– Microsoft Defender for Cloud Evaluate, Archi P.

Recorded Future supplies a whole breakdown of real-time safety breaches or threats, initiates menace mitigation practices, and protects your safety firewall in opposition to snoops or spies.

What actually hooked me from the start was how quick and clever it feels- like having an analyst crew working 24/7, consistently feeding me actionable menace insights. It isn’t simply knowledge dumped from random sources, Recorded Future curates menace intelligence from a powerful mixture of open internet, darkish internet, closed boards and technical telemetry, and one way or the other all of it is sensible.

I can belief the alerts I obtain as a result of they aren’t solely real-time but in addition prioritized based mostly on relevance and influence.

I additionally appreciated the fusion of machine velocity assortment with human-curated evaluation. It means I do not simply get the automated noise; I get contextual and enriched intelligence that I can work on.

This mix actually helps our proactive, intelligence-driven safety operations. The integration with SIEMs and SOAR platforms makes life simpler too, as the whole lot plugs in seamlessly with out having to create workarounds.

I additionally admire the myriad of options, like their super-detailed menace maps, threat scores, and entity profiles. If you’re in an enormous group, the premium options in upper-tier subscriptions supply much more superior modules like assault floor monitoring, model safety, and geopolitical intelligence. 

Some plans additionally include analyst-on-demand companies, which is nice once I want knowledgeable validation for a fast strategic seek the advice of and recommendation. 

Nonetheless, there have been just a few areas that I struggled with, and even G2 reviewers talked about as potential areas of enchancment. The interface, whereas highly effective, felt overwhelming at first. There may be simply a lot knowledge, and until you are taking the time to tune it and filter what’s related, you’ll drown within the sea of alerts that the system detects.

I’ve undoubtedly needed to lean on our account executives throughout onboarding to make sense of the whole lot. And I ought to point out,  these account executives are significantly top-notch. Their help crew is tremendous responsive and proactive. It is simply that generally we depend on them a bit an excessive amount of to get the total worth of the platform.

I really feel just like the pricing may be steep and exorbitant as nicely. Recorded Future is not low-cost, and so they have moved from a unified license mannequin to a extra modular pricing construction. The pliability is good in idea, nevertheless it additionally implies that extra superior options like fraud detection, vulnerability intelligence, or nation-state actor monitoring are locked behind extra premium plans. For small safety groups or budget-conscious orgs, this may be a bit limiting.

General, I really feel recorded future helps create and co-relate menace knowledge from inside methods, present a menace mitigation framework, and analyze real-time menace detection situations to raise your safety a notch.

What I dislike about Recorded Future:

• Whereas Recorded Future presents a whole package deal, nevertheless it comes with a price. I observed that the superior tier plans require you to pay a hefty quantity. Additionally, you want to pay for every additional API integration, so the licensing mannequin is dear.
• I additionally discovered that whereas the platform is highly effective, it may be difficult for brand spanking new customers to make the most of and work with it with out intensive coaching. The educational curve is steep, notably for superior options like question builder and integrations.

What do G2 customers dislike about Recorded Future:

“The recorded future has so many alternative modules that it may be a bit obscure what capabilities my crew does and doesn’t have entry to.”

– Recorded Future Evaluate, Tyler C.

Cyberint is an end-to-end cyber intelligence platform that enables firms to detect, analyze, and examine unwarranted actions and cyber threats earlier than they adversely influence the general privateness community.

I’ve been exploring Cyberint’s Argos Menace Intelligence Platform for fairly a while, and I’ve to say that it’s a blended bag. What actually drew me in at first was how intuitive and user-friendly the interface is. It would not bombard you with jargon or overcomplicated workflows, which is strictly what’s necessary when integrating it along with your safety operations.

The device’s safety framework was accomplished by real-time menace detection and assault floor monitoring. Inside days, Argos helped our crew determine and reply to darkish internet threats and model impersonations we did not even know existed.

I additionally appreciated their customizable alert system. Every alert comes tagged with the respective menace type- be it fishing, credential leaks, uncovered belongings, or suspicious mentions on illicit boards.

The platform would not simply throw knowledge at you; it contextualizes it. We notably benefited from their darkish internet intelligence and deep visibility into menace actors’ ways, methods, and procedures (TTPs). It felt like having a 24/7 menace hunter embedded in our crew.

A characteristic I’ve come to depend on closely is Argo’s third-party threat monitoring, which checks for vulnerabilities throughout our vendor ecosystem. This sort of foresight has saved us a number of instances from potential publicity. The model safety module is top-notch. It actively screens social media, rogue domains, and pretend apps impersonating our enterprise. Actually, it’s one of the vital full suites I’ve seen in a menace intelligence platform.

That stated, it’s not with out its faults. For starters, the API can really feel undercooked. I used to be anticipating much more mature and versatile catalog for integration into our broader SOAR pipeline, however I discovered it missing. Some customers, together with me, additionally struggled with the restricted customization of dashboards and reviews. 

It is like when you hit the boundaries of the UI, you are caught. There has additionally been suggestions round copying/pasting visible knowledge like menace graphs or picture proof, which is not seamless and provides friction when collaborating throughout groups.

One other subject we bumped into was round false positives. Whereas uncommon, once they do occur, the filtering and suggestions mechanism isn’t as easy as I’d like. I additionally discovered that some options appeared half-baked or unnecessarily gated, probably relying on the pricing tier, although that half isn’t all the time clearly communicated.

Talking of pricing, Cyberint presents a number of plan tiers. Whereas they don’t publish them publicly, based mostly on my analysis and others’ experiences, the core differentiators usually revolve across the depth of exterior assault floor protection, the quantity of monitored belongings, and the SLA-driven menace response timeframes.

Their premium plans embrace devoted analysts, superior API entry, and customized model monitoring rulesets. In case your org is mid-to-large scale and actively focused, I’d undoubtedly advocate going for the upper tier.

General, Cyberint presents end-to-end menace safety, deep monitoring, and safety in opposition to exterior vulnerabilities inside its software program stack to safeguard your belongings in opposition to threats.

What I dislike about Cyberint:

• Whereas Cyberint supplies end-to-end alerts about lively assaults, you want to manually replace the standing of alerts, even in case you have accomplished so through a SIEM system.
• I additionally observed some minor UI bugs, like alerts not opening in a brand new web page when urgent Ctrl+click on. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Cyberint:

There are options within the resolution that appear to have redundant performance, however nonetheless, such performance continues to be helpful to a company.

One other factor is that the extra options generally is a bit regarding by way of the group’s funds. However, if such a burden may be dealt with, I absolutely help having this resolution in case you are searching for a cyber menace intelligence resolution

– Cyberint Evaluate, Gen Hart B.

Crowdstrike Endpoint Safety Platform supplies anti-ransomware options to keep up safety benchmark throughout all of your community units and tech stack. It covers incidents, vulnerabilities, assaults, and malware detection beneath its belt.

What instantly stood out to me was how light-weight it’s. It doesn’t bathroom down system efficiency like some older-gen antivirus instruments do. The setup was refreshingly simple, too. I used to be capable of deploy it throughout endpoints with minimal friction, and the unified agent structure meant I didn’t should juggle a number of installs for various modules.

Considered one of its superpowers is real-time menace detection. CrowdStrike’s cloud-native structure leverages behavioral analytics and AI-based menace intelligence to proactively detect anomalies like ransomware, fileless malware, zero-day assaults, and extra.

I used to be additionally impressed with how briskly it reacts. The Falcon Forestall module (included even within the base plan) already outperforms many conventional AVs, however as quickly as I added Falcon Perception for EDR, I actually noticed the ability of real-time telemetry and investigation. The extent of element it supplies is like having a magnifying glass into your community exercise.

What I additionally admire is the single-agent method. I didn’t should overload machines with totally different endpoint instruments. Whether or not it was vulnerability administration via Falcon Highlight, menace looking through Falcon OverWatch, or system management, the whole lot built-in seamlessly.

In case you go for higher-tier plans like Falcon Enterprise or Falcon Full, you additionally get 24/7 managed menace looking, which, let’s be sincere, is a sport changer when your crew is small or overworked. These guys virtually turn into your SOC extension.

However there are some drawbacks to the device. One factor that I need to level out is the price, as a result of it is not essentially the most reasonably priced platform on the market. If you’re in a small enterprise or simply beginning out, the module pricing would possibly really feel a bit an excessive amount of.

One other space the place it lacked a bit was buyer help. Whereas I had stable interactions with help crew, however there have been instances that ticket resolutions acquired a bit extra dragged.

I additionally need to point out the prevalence of “false positives.” They’re uncommon, however once they do pop up, it may be a bit tough to analyze and suppress until you might be tremendous acquainted with the console.

Talking of it, the Falcon Console is highly effective, however not precisely intuitive for first-timers. It took me a little bit of poking round to know all dashboards and settings.
And whereas the platform excels in detection, I really feel the remediation capabilities can enhance.

General, Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection supplies full protection in opposition to unwarranted threats or assaults and helps you mitigate deadly threats or breakouts.

What I dislike about Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Safety Platform:

• Though it does an excellent job of offering alerts and updates, we can not go into a lot element once we choose the sensor from the system tray.
• I additionally observed that there are various screens to handle, it’s arduous to achieve each characteristic, and there’s a want to know computer systems at a excessive degree.

What do G2 customers dislike about Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform:

“For some newer apps, the extent of integration is not as pleasant and easy correctly. Additionally, Linux help may be improved.”

– Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform Evaluate, Atanu M.

Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety supplies AI-powered knowledge safety in opposition to email-borne and harmful assaults. It leverages machine studying and social graphing to detect threats in real-time.

Mimecast is among the instruments that runs quietly within the background, shielding our group from phishing, malware, spoofing, and impersonation makes an attempt. It hardly ever lets something malicious slip via.

The AI-driven safety is legit, I’ve seen it catch some extremely subtle impersonation makes an attempt, particularly these tough CEO fraud-style emails that used to fly beneath the radar.

Considered one of my favourite options is its real-time hyperlink and attachment scanning. When an e mail hits your inbox, Mimecast doesn’t simply let it cross via. It actively scans the whole lot embedded within the message. Plus, the e-mail continuity characteristic additionally proves helpful. Throughout service outages, Mimecast retains our e mail site visitors flowing in order that communication would not cease.

I additionally appreciated the admin dashboard, which is stacked with capabilities. Initially, it felt a bit overwhelming, however type of thrilling. When you get previous the preliminary curve, although, it turns into a robust management heart.

You’ll be able to configure insurance policies all the way down to the smallest element, set granular filtering guidelines, and simply entry logs and menace reviews. I particularly admire the e-mail archiving and e-discovery instruments. They’re clear, searchable, and make regulatory compliance easy.

However the platform does have its share of limitations. False positives generally is a little bit of ache. Mimecast is usually too aggressive, flagging legit messages as suspicious.

The false positives generally is a little bit of a ache. Mimecast is usually too aggressive, flagging legit messages as suspicious, which implies I’ve to step in and manually launch or whitelist sure emails. That would not be such a trouble if the interface for whitelisting weren’t a bit clunky.

Additionally, configuring superior insurance policies can generally require a great deal of trial and error, and some of my colleagues have grumbled about SAML login errors that have an effect on admin entry intermittently.

So far as pricing is anxious, Mimecast is not low-cost. It undoubtedly consists of extra premium plans. Relying in your subscription tier, you get various ranges of help and have depth. I explored a lower-tier help plan, however even then, the response instances have been stable. That stated, some customers talked about that they’d like sooner decision, particularly for pressing safety occasions.

What I discover notably useful is how scalable Mimecast is. Its cloud-based deployment makes it tremendous simple to develop along with your group, whether or not you might be including customers or extending insurance policies to new areas.

For bigger organizations, coping with heavy e mail volumes and sophisticated menace vectors, it’s essential that the device presents flexibility because the enterprise scales and grows its infrastructure.

General, Mimecast presents tight-knit e mail safety protection and encryption to safe crucial knowledge exchanges and alerts the system on the prevalence of any infiltration.

What I dislike about Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety

• Though Mimecast detects any presence of phishing makes an attempt or malware in emails, it may be a bit aggressive with filtering, resulting in false positives that require guide evaluation.
• One other factor I observed is that Mimecast flags legit emails as suspicious at instances, resulting in delays in communication.

What do G2 customers dislike about Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety:

The draw back is that the help is a bit off-putting in case you are previous your implementation section. Among the guidelines and insurance policies are arduous to configure via implementation.

– Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety Evaluate, Jessica C.

Threatlocker is a good device for detecting and capturing undesirable exercise throughout your safety community. It supplies a suite of cybersecurity instruments to scale your knowledge and content material safety workflows and scale back the chance of information breaches or vulnerabilities.

I’ve explored a number of safety instruments earlier than, however Threatlocker stands out, principally as a result of it does what it guarantees. From the start, it was clear that this wasn’t a fundamental antivirus or general-purpose device. It is constructed particularly to implement zero belief on the software degree.

The core characteristic, software whitelisting, implies that solely software program we’ve explicitly authorized can run. It provides us quick visibility into unauthorized packages and, in lots of circumstances, stops potential threats earlier than they even begin.

One other characteristic I take advantage of closely is Ringfencing. It’s not nearly what apps can run but in addition about what they’re allowed to work together with. For instance, I can cease a trusted software like Microsoft Phrase from launching PowerShell or accessing delicate knowledge directories. This degree of segmentation has helped us forestall lateral motion and prohibit how even authorized instruments can behave.

ThreatLocker’s help crew has been one of the vital dependable facets of the expertise. Any time we hit a configuration subject or wanted steerage, they had been fast to reply and useful all through. That degree of help made an actual distinction, particularly within the early days once we had been nonetheless determining the right way to construction insurance policies successfully.

That stated, the educational curve was vital. It took time to know how totally different insurance policies work together and the right way to construction guidelines with out over-blocking or permitting an excessive amount of. It’s not one thing you arrange in an hour and neglect about—it requires an actual dedication to managing insurance policies and staying on high of latest alerts.

There have been additionally moments the place the platform’s quick tempo of improvement made issues difficult. Options had been up to date or added continuously, and whereas that reveals the product is actively bettering, it additionally implies that documentation generally lagged behind. At instances, it felt like we needed to relearn elements of the platform extra usually than we’d like.

Aside from this, the device additionally consists of different helpful options like storage management to dam unauthorized USB entry, which has prevented the chance of information leaks. The elevation management module permits us to tightly handle which customers can run software program with elevated privileges, thereby making privilege escalation extra auditable.

We additionally depend on centralized logging and audit trails to evaluation any violations or exceptions, which is essential for compliance and inside evaluations.

General, Threatlocker allows you to rigorously monitor your safety workflows and be certain that your knowledge is dealt with appropriately by approved customers inside the group to get rid of any sudden menace chance.

What I dislike about Threatlocker:

• Whereas Threatlocker empowers you to enhance your zero belief method and privileges, it takes a while to fine-tune insurance policies, particularly at first, and managing approvals generally is a little bit of a studying curve.
• Whereas Threatlocker is a strong safety device, the general studying curve might be steep for customers who aren’t acquainted with its interface and sophisticated configurations.

What do G2 customers dislike about Threatlocker:

“It isn’t a draw back, however ThreatLocker requires time & assets to totally perceive the product and supply wonderful help to your clients. It isn’t a click on and deploy and by no means take a look at it once more product. That stated, we spend possibly 1-2 hours every week reviewing approval requests after the preliminary rollout.”

– Threatlocker Evaluate, Jonathan G. 

CloudSEK is an AI-powered menace intelligence device that detects cyber-threats, extends safety protection to cloud databases, and screens any suspicious exercise from a centralized platform to enhance knowledge protection mechanisms.

The very first thing that caught my eye was the dashboard. It’s extremely intuitive and neatly laid out, making it simple to get a complete snapshot of your menace panorama with out drowning in noise.

Every part from model monitoring to VIP safety and digital threat monitoring is introduced in a approach that simply is sensible. I discovered it tremendous helpful to have all these modules tightly built-in; it gave me a whole image of our digital publicity with minimal effort.

What I really like most about CloudSEK is its proactive method. The platform would not simply provide you with a warning about present threats, it additionally surfaces rising dangers earlier than they escalate. That is an enormous step if you find yourself making an attempt to stay one step forward of adversaries.

As an example, their menace actor profiling and context-rich incident summaries actually helped me perceive not simply the “what”, but in addition the “who” and “why” behind every alert. Plus, their bulk closure characteristic for incidents is an absolute time saver, particularly if you find yourself coping with recurring or false-positive susceptible alerts. 

Nonetheless, talking of false positives, there are just a few areas the place the device would not fairly reside up. Whereas the detection engine is highly effective, it may well generally be a bit too enthusiastic, flagging incidents that didn’t require escalation. It isn’t a call driver, nevertheless it does imply you want to make investments a while upfront in fine-tuning your alert guidelines.

Additionally, creating new guidelines or use-cases isn’t as easy as I’d like. It could possibly really feel a bit inflexible in comparison with different platforms that supply extra customization choices out of the field.

Digging into the premium options, CloudSEK presents tiered subscription plans that scale nicely relying on the maturity of your safety program. On the core, you get digital threat monitoring, floor internet and deep/darkish internet surveillance, and built-in model and area safety.

What stood out to me was the simplicity of deploying the platform. In contrast to some bloated safety instruments that require weeks {of professional} companies to stand up and working, CloudSEK was comparatively plug-and-play. That stated, I did hit just a few bumps when making an attempt to automate sure workflows. 

It does supply API integration, however the documentation is not strong for extra commonplace processes. 

General,  CloudSEK supplies safe authentication frameworks to guard your digital privateness and set safety benchmarks to investigate, mitigate, and overcome real-time alerts and dangers.

What I dislike about CloudSEK:

• Though CloudSEK presents real-time menace alerts, the variety of false positives is alarming when the alert rule just isn’t tuned correctly.
• I additionally observed the sheer quantity of alerts, which makes it seem as if we’re consistently drowning in knowledge that principally seems to be irrelevant or false positives.

What do G2 customers dislike about CloudSEK:

“If CloudSEK might streamline its setup course of and supply extra aggressive pricing, I might be way more inclined to advocate it.”

– CloudSEK Evaluate, Rajendra D.

In 2025, focus your knowledge safety workflow hub in a single place with the very best SIEM software program and select a extra centralized approach of monitoring your knowledge remotely.